Featured
Table of Contents
Both propose to get rid of the ability to "online forum shop" by omitting a debtor's location of incorporation from the location analysis, andalarming to international debtorsexcluding cash or money equivalents from the "principal assets" formula. Furthermore, any equity interest in an affiliate will be deemed situated in the same area as the principal.
Generally, this testament has been concentrated on questionable third party release arrangements carried out in current mass tort cases such as Purdue Pharma, Boy Scouts of America, and lots of Catholic diocese bankruptcies. These provisions often force lenders to release non-debtor third celebrations as part of the debtor's plan of reorganization, even though such releases are perhaps not permitted, a minimum of in some circuits, by the Bankruptcy Code.
In effort to stamp out this behavior, the proposed legislation claims to limit "online forum shopping" by prohibiting entities from filing in any venue other than where their home office or principal physical assetsexcluding cash and equity interestsare located. Ostensibly, these bills would promote the filing of Chapter 11 cases in other United States districts, and steer cases far from the favored courts in New york city, Delaware and Texas.
Regardless of their laudable function, these proposed amendments could have unexpected and potentially negative repercussions when seen from an international restructuring prospective. While congressional testimony and other commentators presume that place reform would simply make sure that domestic companies would submit in a various jurisdiction within the US, it is a distinct possibility that worldwide debtors might hand down the United States Bankruptcy Courts altogether.
Without the factor to consider of money accounts as an avenue towards eligibility, many foreign corporations without concrete properties in the US may not qualify to file a Chapter 11 insolvency in any US jurisdiction. Second, even if they do qualify, worldwide debtors may not have the ability to rely on access to the usual and practical reorganization friendly jurisdictions.
Given the intricate problems often at play in a global restructuring case, this might cause the debtor and financial institutions some uncertainty. This unpredictability, in turn, may motivate international debtors to submit in their own countries, or in other more helpful countries, rather. Especially, this proposed place reform comes at a time when numerous nations are emulating the United States and revamping their own restructuring laws.
In a departure from their previous restructuring system which stressed liquidation, the brand-new Code's goal is to reorganize and maintain the entity as a going issue. Thus, debt restructuring arrangements might be authorized with as little as 30 percent approval from the general financial obligation. However, unlike the US, Italy's brand-new Code will not feature an automatic stay of enforcement actions by financial institutions.
In February of 2021, a Canadian court extended the nation's approval of 3rd party release arrangements. In Canada, businesses generally restructure under the traditional insolvency statutes of the Companies' Lenders Plan Act (). Third party releases under the CCAAwhile fiercely objected to in the USare a common aspect of restructuring plans.
The current court decision makes clear, though, that regardless of the CBCA's more restricted nature, 3rd party release arrangements may still be appropriate. For that reason, business might still get themselves of a less cumbersome restructuring offered under the CBCA, while still receiving the advantages of 3rd celebration releases. Efficient as of January 1, 2021, the Dutch Act Upon Court Verification of Extrajudicial Restructuring Plans has developed a debtor-in-possession procedure performed beyond formal bankruptcy proceedings.
Efficient as of January 1, 2021, Germany's new Act upon the Stabilization and Restructuring Structure for Businesses offers pre-insolvency restructuring procedures. Prior to its enactment, German companies had no alternative to reorganize their financial obligations through the courts. Now, distressed business can hire German courts to restructure their debts and otherwise protect the going issue value of their company by utilizing numerous of the same tools available in the US, such as maintaining control of their service, enforcing stuff down restructuring strategies, and carrying out collection moratoriums.
Inspired by Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, this new structure streamlines the debtor-in-possession restructuring procedure mostly in effort to help little and medium sized businesses. While prior law was long criticized as too pricey and too intricate since of its "one size fits all" approach, this brand-new legislation includes the debtor in belongings model, and provides for a structured liquidation process when essential In June 2020, the UK enacted the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act of 2020 ().
Especially, CIGA offers a collection moratorium, revokes specific provisions of pre-insolvency agreements, and permits entities to propose a plan with investors and financial institutions, all of which allows the formation of a cram-down plan similar to what might be achieved under Chapter 11 of the US Personal Bankruptcy Code. In 2017, Singapore adopted enacted the Companies (Amendment) Act 2017 (Singapore), that made major legal changes to the restructuring arrangements of the Singapore Companies Act (Cap 50) 2006.
As a result, the law has considerably improved the restructuring tools available in Singapore courts and propelled Singapore as a leading center for insolvency in the Asia-Pacific. In May of 2016, India enacted the Insolvency and Insolvency Code, which totally upgraded the insolvency laws in India. This legislation looks for to incentivize additional investment in the nation by providing higher certainty and performance to the restructuring process.
Provided these recent changes, worldwide debtors now have more options than ever. Even without the proposed limitations on eligibility, foreign entities might less need to flock to the United States as previously. Even more, need to the US' location laws be modified to prevent simple filings in specific convenient and beneficial places, global debtors might start to think about other locations.
Unique thanks to Dallas partner Michael Berthiaume who prepared and authored this material under the guidance of Rebecca Winthrop, Of Counsel in our Los Angeles workplace.
Consumer insolvency filings increased 9% in January 2026 compared to January 2025, with 44,282 customer filings that month alone. Business filings jumped 49% year-over-year the greatest January level because 2018. The numbers show what financial obligation experts call "slow-burn financial strain" that's been constructing for several years. If you're having a hard time, you're not an outlier.
Consumer personal bankruptcy filings amounted to 44,282 in January 2026, up 9% from January 2025. Business filings struck 1,378 a 49% year-over-year jump and the greatest January industrial filing level considering that 2018. For all of 2025, consumer filings grew almost 14%.
Latest Posts
The Latest Manual to Handling Insolvency in 2026
Expert Advice for Resolving Personal Debt
Preventing Foreclosure Through HUD Counseling